Research Featured

The AI Adoption Gap: Which States Are Leading and Lagging In the Use of Generative AI?

Get a data-driven look at how generative AI is being used across the country. Discover which states are leading the charge and which ones are lagging behind.

Daniel Anderson

Somehow, AI went from niche to mainstream practically overnight. What started in 2023 as a simple chatbot to help dodge writing emails has evolved into something far more advanced. I mean, have you seen those Ameca robots? Talk about real-life Ex Machina.

Today, generative AI is designing products, generating complex code, assisting doctors with diagnostics, powering autonomous tools, and, yes, occasionally tricking boomers into believing the Pope wore a puffer jacket. 

Whether we like it or not, generative AI has quickly and quietly embedded itself into our daily lives. But, not all states are jumping on the AI train at the same speed. While some are riding in the front car and refusing to get off, others are still hesitating to step on. 

To see where the digital divide stands, we dug into our platform’s internal data, including tracking session lengths, productivity gains, and peak usage times, to find out which states are using AI the most. The results reveal fascinating patterns about who’s working smarter, who’s spending the most time with their AI assistant, and which regions still need to catch up.

Key Takeaways:

  • Washington D.C. tops the list as the most AI-obsessed region, with the highest per capita usage in the country.
  • Delaware users spend the most time per session, averaging over 17 minutes every time they log on to an AI tool.
  • Rhode Island saves the most time using AI and is the most efficient state, saving an average of more than 32 hours per user.
  • Monday is the most common day for AI use across the country, hinting that users turn to AI to jumpstart the week.
  • The average AI user spends 11 minutes and 36 seconds per session and saves over 10 hours of time using generative tools.
  • There is a moderate positive correlation (0.62) between session length and hours saved, suggesting that longer AI sessions tend to result in more hours saved.

AI Engagement by State

Washington D.C. tops the charts in per capita AI usage. Between policy analysts, legal aides, consultants, and caffeinated interns writing briefs at 2 a.m., the city runs on fast-paced productivity tools. But in terms of actual time saved, D.C. lands further down the list, with just 7.48 hours saved per user, showing that high usage doesn’t always mean high efficiency.

Meanwhile, Delaware leads in average session length at over 17 minutes, and Rhode Island claims the title of most efficient state, saving more than 32 hours per user (not bad for the smallest state in the country).

On the other end of the spectrum, South Dakota, Wyoming, and Kansas are lagging behind. South Dakota users saved an average of just 0.81 hours, the lowest in the country. Wyoming wasn’t far ahead with 1.1 hours, and Kansas rounded out the bottom three at 2.83 hours saved per user. These states not only rank lowest in efficiency but also have some of the smallest user bases overall. Whether due to lack of access, awareness, or interest, users in these regions have yet to unlock the time-saving benefits their coastal and tech-savvy counterparts are already capitalizing on.

The bottom line? D.C. is working longer, Rhode Island is working smarter, and much of the Midwest is … working on it.

When America Uses AI

8:00 p.m. is the most common time for AI usage across the country, with 22 states logging in during this evening window. It’s likely that people are squeezing in productivity after the traditional 9-to-5 — students finishing those essays due tomorrow, professionals tackling leftover tasks, or maybe just those looking for last minute dinner inspiration. Rhode Island, the most efficient AI-using state, peaks a little earlier at 6:00 p.m, proving that evening hours are prime time for a little AI assistance.

Monday is the most AI-active day of the week, suggesting people are using AI to shake off the Sunday scaries and start the week strong. 

Some states are even tapping into AI during the 9-to-5 grind. Oregon starts as early as 9:00 a.m., with Vermont, Delaware, Utah, and others following throughout the afternoon. Hawaii, Nevada, Wyoming, and Alaska all see their heaviest usage right at 5:00 p.m., suggesting many users are turning to AI to knock out those EOD assignments. 

On average, users spend 11 minutes and 36 seconds per session and save about 10 hours and 36 minutes overall. States like Rhode Island, Virginia, and Oklahoma are seeing the biggest gains, while South Dakota and Wyoming are seeing the least.

Either way, it’s clear that AI is quickly becoming America’s go-to Monday motivator and post-work productivity pal.

How States Use AI Differently

Not all AI usage looks the same. While some states are using it to save time or crank out quick content (em dash galore and all), others are taking the extra step to refine and humanize the output. Virginia, Delaware, and Washington D.C. lead the way in reworking and humanizing AI-generated content. That’s a strong sign these tools are being used for professional or academic content creation (i.e. students trying to trick AI detection tools). 

Virginia ranks #1 in both content generation and humanization per capita, meaning people there are using AI constantly, but making sure it doesn’t sound like it. Oregon and Washington D.C. also stand out for high levels of content creation.

Then there’s Wyoming, which is taking a different route. It ranks last in content generation, near the bottom in time saved, but it’s #1 in AI detection searches. In other words, the few folks that live in Wyoming are more interested in spotting AI than using it. 

State-by-State Usage and Query Rankings

State

Humanization Usage Ranking

Content Generation Usage Ranking

AI Detection Queries Ranking

Alabama

15

23

26

Alaska

5

44

51

Arizona

17

8

13

Arkansas

21

49

35

California

8

24

6

Colorado

14

10

10

Connecticut

39

33

28

Delaware

2

25

44

District of Columbia

3

3

4

Florida

6

14

21

Georgia

4

4

12

Hawaii

10

13

5

Idaho

29

43

45

Illinois

16

17

16

Indiana

42

41

31

Iowa

50

45

37

Kansas

36

28

38

Kentucky

34

22

27

Louisiana

25

7

39

Maine

49

26

47

Maryland

12

11

2

Massachusetts

35

35

3

Michigan

46

46

40

Minnesota

47

32

17

Mississippi

38

5

23

Missouri

37

31

36

Montana

51

40

50

Nebraska

31

18

29

Nevada

9

20

19

New Hampshire

13

34

46

New Jersey

19

39

8

New Mexico

24

6

25

New York

18

27

9

North Carolina

28

21

18

North Dakota

11

37

43

Ohio

41

29

34

Oklahoma

23

19

24

Oregon

40

2

22

Pennsylvania

44

30

20

Rhode Island

27

51

41

South Carolina

30

15

32

South Dakota

45

38

49

Tennessee

33

9

30

Texas

7

12

14

Utah

20

42

11

Vermont

48

50

42

Virginia

1

1

15

Washington

22

36

7

West Virginia

32

16

48

Wisconsin

43

47

33

Wyoming

26

48

1

Conclusion

Generative AI has rapidly moved from novelty to necessity, but its adoption is anything but uniform. States like Washington D.C. and Rhode Island are leading the way, whether through high usage or strong efficiency. Meanwhile, others, particularly in the Midwest, are still lagging behind in both engagement and impact.

These state-by-state differences suggest that while AI is becoming a common tool, how it's used  and how much benefit users get from it varies widely. The way people interact with AI offers a window into regional tech habits, workplace culture, and readiness for the impending robot revolution.

Methodology

Insights were derived from internal user data collected over the past 30 days (June 16, 2025 - July 16, 2025), covering session length, engagement type, and productivity metrics, segmented by state. Population data was gathered using the latest census data (2024). Google Trends was used to assess AI detection queries during the same time period as above. 

Fair Use Statement

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.